Understanding the Fee Landscape in Private Real Estate

When investors evaluate a private real estate opportunity, fees are often the first thing they scrutinize and the last thing they truly understand. That instinct is understandable. In public markets, where index funds and low-cost vehicles compete on price, choosing the cheapest option is frequently the right call. Private real estate does not work that way. Here, fees pay for a working team of professionals who source deals, structure financing, execute a business plan, and shepherd an asset from acquisition to sale. At Heritage Hill, we believe fees deserve careful attention, but they should inform a decision rather than dictate it.

Why Fees Exist in the First Place

A private real estate investment is not a passive index. It is an operating business wrapped around a physical asset. Someone has to find the property, underwrite it, negotiate terms, arrange debt, raise equity, and then run the property day to day for years. That same team reports to investors, prepares tax documents such as K-1s, and ultimately manages the sale and the distribution of proceeds. None of that happens for free, and none of it happens well without talented people. Fees are the mechanism that lets a manager attract and retain that talent.

The more useful way to think about fees is as a function of complexity and value creation. A straightforward, stabilized asset with a simple hold strategy should carry lighter fees than a complicated repositioning or a ground-up development that demands far more work and expertise. When fees track the value a manager can genuinely create, they are doing their job. When they simply enrich the sponsor regardless of outcome, they are a red flag.

Where to Find the Details

Every legitimate offering discloses its fees, typically in a private placement memorandum and supporting marketing materials. The challenge is that disclosure is not the same as clarity. Some fees are stated plainly; others are tucked into capitalization tables or footnotes where a casual reader will miss them. We encourage investors to read the documents closely and then go a step further: ask the manager directly to walk through every fee, one by one. A sponsor who welcomes that conversation is showing you something about how they operate.

Broadly, private real estate fees fall into two families. The first is transaction fees, which are paid regardless of how the deal performs. The second is performance-based fees, which are earned only when the investment succeeds.

Transaction Fees: The Guaranteed Layer

Transaction fees keep the lights on. Because they are paid whether or not the deal makes money, they warrant the most scrutiny. The most common ones include:

Acquisition fee. Frequently charged on individually syndicated deals, this fee typically runs between 1 and 2 percent and often declines as deal size grows. It is usually calculated on total deal size rather than on invested equity, and that distinction matters enormously. Consider a property that costs a certain amount and is financed with roughly two-thirds debt. A fee measured against the full purchase price can translate into a materially higher percentage when measured against the equity investors actually contribute. Always convert the fee into a cost-of-equity figure before judging it.

Committed capital fee. Common in fund structures, this fee is charged on committed equity and is typically 1 to 2 percent. It is paid even before capital is deployed. Importantly, a manager who charges a committed capital fee should not also charge an acquisition fee on the same capital. Collecting both is a practice the industry politely calls "double-dipping," and it should give any investor pause.

Investment management (or asset management) fee. This ongoing fee, generally 1 to 2 percent of invested equity, compensates the manager for running the investment. In fund structures it usually replaces the committed capital fee once money is put to work, so investors are not charged twice on the same dollars. This fee should be tied to invested equity, not total deal size.

Set-up and organizational fee. Forming an investment entity involves real one-time costs: legal work, technology, investor relations, and capital-raising expenses. These are commonly passed through to the investment and often range from roughly half a percent to 2 percent of equity. On individual deals they can be buried inside the acquisition cost, so ask specifically what the line item covers.

Administrative fee. Covering tax reporting, audits, fund administration, and software, this fee is usually modest, often a fraction of a percent per year on invested equity.

Financing-related fees. A debt placement fee, frequently paid to an outside broker, is standard practice and typically a fraction of a percent of total debt. Be cautious when a manager layers an additional internal fee on top of the broker's fee. Because debt often exceeds equity by a wide margin, even small percentages against the loan amount can hit equity returns hard. Similar considerations apply to refinancing fees.

Distribution-related fees. Certain products, particularly non-traded REITs sold through advisory networks, carry wholesale marketing fees and advisor or syndication fees that can be substantial, sometimes several percent of equity. These commissions are often the ones most easily hidden in fine print.

Joint venture and selling fees. Joint ventures do not inherently add fees, but they can mean paying two managers instead of one; the fee a manager charges should reflect whether they are merely providing access or actively creating value. Selling fees, usually paid to brokers, are a normal cost of taking an asset to market, though here too some managers add an internal charge on top.

A long list of possible fees can look alarming, but the presence of a category is not the problem. The problem is a manager who treats guaranteed transaction fees as a profit center, extracting value up front regardless of results. That pattern tells you where their priorities lie.

Performance Fees: Aligning Interests

Performance-based fees are the counterweight. They are variable, earned only when the investment does well, and they exist to align the manager's incentives with the investor's. A typical arrangement entitles the manager to somewhere between 20 and 30 percent of profits.

These splits are usually organized through an investment waterfall, a set of rules for dividing cash flows unevenly between the manager and investors. A manager might contribute a small slice of the capital yet be entitled to a larger share of the profits, which is precisely the point: the manager is compensated for skill, not just for writing a check.

Most waterfalls include a preferred return hurdle, a minimum return that investors must receive before the manager participates in profits. Preferred returns commonly fall in the range of 7 to 10 percent annually. Think of it as an interest rate on investor capital, with the crucial caveat that it is a target, not a guarantee.

Two waterfall structures dominate. In a European waterfall, investors receive all cash flow, in proportion to their capital, until they have recovered their full investment plus the preferred return; only then does the manager's share step up. This structure is common in fund vehicles and is generally the more investor-friendly of the two. In an American waterfall, the manager can begin earning performance fees before investors have received all their capital back, though usually only after the preferred return has been paid and often with protective language requiring the manager to reasonably expect the deal to clear the hurdle. American structures show up more often in longer-hold, income-oriented investments.

The Bottom Line

The healthiest fee structures lean toward performance, so the manager prospers when investors prosper. There is a meaningful difference between fees that fund genuine value creation and fees that simply enrich a sponsor at their partners' expense. But at the end of the analysis, the number that matters most is the return investors keep after every fee is accounted for, and whether that net return is fair compensation for the risk taken. Let fees guide your judgment about a manager. Do not let them drive the decision by themselves.

---

Partner with Heritage Hill

The same discipline we bring to scrutinizing fees—favoring performance-based compensation and keeping our interests squarely aligned with our investors'—shapes how we structure every Heritage Hill investment.

If you'd like to see how we put this discipline to work, we invite you to:

• Join our investor list to receive our latest real estate research and new offerings as they become available.
• Schedule a conversation with our team to discuss how private real estate might fit your portfolio.

Connect with Heritage Hill →

This material is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Private real estate investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.